Students will need to interact with people of the opposite gender when they join the workforce. As such they should be kept in separate institutions and should be given what they require. His evidence was very good, and rebuttles were good, too. There they received both in academic education and physical training. There are other few factors that help us get rid of these outdated thinking. Bigler adds, however, that as public single-sex schools increasingly begin to offer admission based on a lottery system, opportunities for more effective studies on the topic should emerge. More arguments in the following rounds.
I will be glad to see more of your arguments to prove that single sex schools are better than co-ed schools. Sometimes girls feel pressured by the male counterpart to choose subjects that follow the general female stereotype, such as creative arts and music. Gauteng was the top-performing province with the highest matric pass rate in the country. By this way, co-education is an essential part in the education system which pushes the genders to work together and blend with each other to survive in this brutal world. In a similar way, if a co-ed class was focusing on auditory-based education, the grades performed by males are highly likely to fall behind the females. There are various prestigious institutions in our country for providing quality education.
In one set of classrooms, teachers were asked to avoid making divisions by sex, and in the other, teachers were asked to use gendered language and divisions, such as lining children up by gender and asking boys and girls to post their work on separate bulletin boards. In ancient times, Greece was the only country which allowed coeducation. There the boys and girls were given both the academic and physical education together. It may be helpful to know that I am male. Rightly did Stephen Leacock say. It not only educate a person but also vanishes the distance between boys and girls which is really necessary.
The healthy and invigorating relationship between them will be of immense value to the making of a new India. All my children will be going through it as well. Certain problems are existing in our educational system. The system of coeducation proved to be so successful that Indian leaders adopted it after the independence of India. Both try their best to surpass and outstrip one another in matters of academic distinction. Secondly, a free exchange of ideas between boys and girls gives rise to a healthy relationship between the two sexes. A feeling of comradeship will also develop between the boys and girls.
Professor Analia Schlosser, an economist from the Eitan Berglas School of Economics at Tel Aviv, found that elementary school, co-ed classrooms with a majority of female students showed increased academic performance for both boys and girls. Co-ed schools are better than single sex schools, because of three reasons. When it comes to competing with one another in the field of academics, one realises that boys and girls are almost the same in terms of potential and capability. Besides this, boys and girls need different types of education. Furthermore, my opponent has stated that teachers are not trained for single sex. According to Osman, parents need to consider other serious issues when picking a school for their children, rather than focusing only on gender.
I feel that many arguments against single sex is short sighted and people do not see the long term. Teachers also draw parallels between brain and muscle development, reminding struggling students that the mind strengthens with effort, and that practice makes the work easier. The feeling of male dominance may be wiped out from the society if this system of education is given importance. Studies have shown that students perform better in co-ed schools. In a co-educational school, boys are free to meet and talk with girls. A higher percentage of girls lowers classroom disruption and creates better relationships with the teacher.
Three reasons why co-ed schools are better than single sex schools are boys and girls can cooperate with opposite sex, they can gain ability to fight against obstacles, and girls and boys can understand the differences between them. Many proponents of single sex education argue that boys in coeducational settings are less likely to take courses in the arts or tackle advanced academic subjects simply to avoid being typecast as a nerd. According to research of a Canadian university, over half of the students went to co-ed elementary schools. An emotional involvement at an early stage can come with lot of baggage that can force a child to deviate from their goals. I thought my opponent would give many arguments, so I am surprised to see only one argument. Plato was a great supporter of the education of women. Co-education is an economical system, because both boys and girls can study in same schools and they can be taught by the same staff.
Learning styles also differ from each gender as argued in R1 and therefore the way they approach the project may cause complications when working with the opposing gender. Dis-advantages of Co-Education Of course certain conservative people criticize the system of co-education. That's all he is citing here. They conclude that this effect is due to the positive influence, the girls are adding to the classroom environment. But the majority of both boys and girls would be able to learn better.