I am undecided at this point but to everyone else, let people have their own opinion even if that includes what religion says. The new offspring will be genetically identical to the organism that donated the nucleus. There are court precedents though; a cancer cell line was developed and very profitable to a pharmaceutical laboratory and the lawsuit that the patient brought to bear was heard and the result? The significance of the first cloned mammal, Dolly, was that for the first time cloning was achieved from an adult differentiated cell. Cloning can be a means to create animals with identical genetics. To eliminate diversity loss, a similar species would need to be introduced to the genetic pool which would change the future course of the animal anyway. A pet owner with the means to pay could essentially extend the life of a beloved dog or cat forever by creating endless copies.
This science could help to restore balance to planetary ecosystems. Humans are naturally inquisitive beings and sometimes we do things purely because we want to see or know how something truly was. We could end strife and suffering in the world with cloned plants to make mass production easier. The science behind the cloning Dolly has the distinction of being not only the first cloned mammal but also the first to arrive by nuclear transfer. The medicine-producing animal can continue to be cloned, creating an endless supply of the drugs patients need.
The article and comments helped me. As technologies improve, however, the science behind animal cloning could lead to human cloning and the plethora of moral and intellectual arguments which would come with it. By bringing back animals that were once extinct, we can gain actually insights into the process natural evolution and potentially bring in natural resources that are not available to us at the moment. Cloned plants also are more predictable, which could help save millions of dollars in farming costs, and plants near extinction could be saved through the right cloning programs. It can be used to increase the supply of meat and milk for consumption. This article is going to run through four pros and four cons of bringing back extinct animals with the help of cloning and try to see whether it is the right or wrong thing to do.
List of Pros of Cloning Humans 1. After 60 cycles of division, stem cells can even develop mutations that might lead to cancer. Do I agree with them? There would be a great temptation to make profits from the practice. The science of human cloning continues to develop and it will not be long before technology will make this a reality. It is here that concerns are loudly voiced and take up headlines in the media. With human cloning on the rise, it is greatly possible that human beings would become more of a commodity than an individual. As I said earlier in this article, this debate will continue.
The clones from these animals could serve as the perfect control subject for testing, they would be able to compare results directly to how the animal is normally. Is it okay to produce human clones? The following are some of the pros of cloning. Cloned animals also serve as an important research tool. Ethics of Animal Cloning While most scientists consider the process of animal cloning as a major break through and see many beneficial possibilities in it, many people are uncomfortable with the idea, considering it to be 'against nature' and ethically damning, particularly in the instance of cloning human beings. Standardized test subjects Those who object to animal research often cite the genetic variance in lab animals as proof that any results obtained in the lab cannot be generalized. I believe in the cloning of a particular plant to help with our farming needs. When using therapeutic cloning, embryos are destroyed to provide treatment to another animal that is suffering from disease.
Scientists and medical researchers can also have enough animal models for drug experiments and testing. Not everyone agrees to cloning, where some people claim that it is immoral and unethical, as well as even a potential source of a new world scheme where there would be superior and inferior animals. The offspring develops to term and is birthed naturally. One way that scientists say will solve this problem is by cloning muscle and flesh samples of animals and growing them in laboratories. Also, research into nerve regeneration for people with paralyzing injuries is going on at an ever accelerating rate since actor Christopher Reeve gave it a huge push before he died.
In some species, cloning occurs naturally because of asexual reproduction. Livestock, such as cows, goats and sheep, are great sources of protein that are needed in the science of medicine, particularly in the research on human blood clotting. The creation of identical copies of animals — through cloning, it is possible to create genetically identical animals for organ or tissue transplantation; and the creation of identical copies of only the best animal population 2. List of Cons of Reproductive Cloning 1. It is just a completely wrong idea for the many. We can introduce specific outcomes through animal cloning.
It makes a new testament to counter the science to put god back in favor but through all its efforts the holy books are not made by god but man so dying and the age of religion is coming to an end vary fast so just let it die and all the better of it. But, when the time comes that the method would be perfected, reproductive cloning can be used to help infertile parents who would like to have their own children as well as parents who want to have twins. During the process of animal breeding, when two species of the same or different breeds are crossed, the probability of healthy offspring with desired traits can't be predicted with mathematical accuracy. If a family member is sick from a bad heart, and is close to death, you might think, If i clone her, I can take a heart from the clone, and put it in her. In the real world, it still remains experimental and comes with a lot of scientific limitations. I need more than that because i need to win this debate we are having. I think that cloning isn't something that should happen too often.
As with any groundbreaking decision, there will be unforeseen benefits and consequences if we proceed with cloning extinct animals. Single-cell organisms like some yeasts and bacteria naturally reproduce clones of parent cells via budding or binary fission. We already work on this through artificial natural selection. For example, blood cells need the hemoglobin gene on while skins cells do not. Is it okay to duplicate nature to this extent? Though cloning may work wonders in genetics, it has some potential disadvantages.