Also, another complaint about the use of computers is the algorithm for evaluating student performance itself: it is just mysterious. Since the students spend a lot of time preparing for standardized tests, they therefore skip their daily activities of playing and exercising. According to a study in the Oct. However, because they are mainly used as a way for schools to pit students against one another for admission to their school or other competitive means, the cons heavily outweigh the pros. As technologies and knowledge changes and grows, our educational systems must be able to adapt. If a teacher is underperforming, then this can be identified and adjustment quickly as well.
In doing so, the goal is to raise the testing scores that the teachers and students are able to achieve. This also goes for children with special needs who will be taking the same tests with students without disabilities. From there, teachers can focus on improving the math curriculum so students will score better next time. Standardized testing has been around for a long time with a storied history of evaluating university prospects, job candidates, and other forms of aptitude and intelligence. In some cases, a school can be closed or taken over by the state. Standardized testing is a subject that many people feel strongly about.
New technology in the classroom is changing the way we view standardized testing in particular and learning assessment in general. The teacher prepares and carries out the tasks associated with certain learning skills and uniformly applied across the students. It could prevent children to prepare for a productive adult life. Between regular homework, touring colleges and maintaining extracurriculars, there is a lot to think about. Examples of standardized testing is the multiple choice test type where students from a certain level are given test questions that are also given to other students in other schools in a state or region. The format is also biased toward male students, who studies have shown adapt more easily to the game-like point scoring of multiple-choice questions.
During junior and senior years of high school, as students begin thinking about college admissions, they often find themselves filled with dread. Standardized Testing Cons Outdated Theoretical Basis Standardized tests have evolved to some degree since their creation nearly a century ago, but they still primarily test accumulated knowledge and very basic skills, while educational theory now emphasizes critical thinking and problem solving skills over the memorization of rote knowledge. Standardized test was first enacted to grade-schoolers in 1996. Scholars have judged standardized testing to be a very mechanical way to test students. Educational Purposes Standardized testing is also a useful tool to determine how prepared is a child to go to school and assess their intellectual levels. It is used to determine current averages and identify high and low performers so that each student can be treated accordingly. Moreover, there have been studies that male students are more adept in answering multiple-type questions than girls, making it bias.
Most of the institutions have a computer adaptive response system that scans the answer paper of the candidate and produces the score within minutes. With the addition of this program, federally mandated tests increased from six to 17. One major cause standardized testing has to helping teachers is that it allows us to track the students progression. Prepares Students Supporters of standardized testing claim that the strict rules in testing centers and the increased time for preparation are advantageous to students since they become more ready for college. Parental disapproval is evidenced by the recent , a movement where students refuse to take mandated tests. Tests are also developed by experts, and each question undergoes an intense process to ensure its validity—that it properly assesses the content—and its reliability, which means that the question tests consistently over time. These standardized tests are either aptitude tests or achievement tests.
Standardized assessments give parents, students and staff the assurance that our students can and do perform at the highest levels. According to the late Gerald W. List of Cons of Standardized Testing 1. The scores on a standardized test become part of the public record. How will a certain score prove that the child is good at one subject and bad in another? However, American students have slipped from 18th in the 2000 world math rankings to 31st place in 2009, with a similar decline in science, while there has been no change in reading. Accountability Operating a streamlined public education system requires measures of accountability to insure that all students learn certain basic skills and concepts, while educators and institutions must perform according to certain measurable standards. Also, given that tests are easy to implement, they save a lot of time too.
I believe the key is to use the test results as a guide for teachers, parents, and students. After George Bush, the former president of the U. This also determines the intellectual level of students. Teachers can see what they need to teach and when they are able to teach it. Categories Tags , Post navigation.
The reason given by the supporters of this testing methodology is the disparity in the educational patterns and curriculum throughout the United States. The pros and cons of standardized testing show us that evaluating how students and teachers perform is an important part of the educational process. As such, they can easily identify the students who need remediation or advancement. However, it also remains to a contentious issue. The outcry over the absurdity of standardized testing warranted it an 18-minute skewering on Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? The Education Ministry in Ontario annually uses this kind of test for the purpose of elevating the level of standards in education for future development. A national 2007 study by the Center on Education Policy reported that since 2001, 44% of school districts had reduced the time spent on science, social studies and the arts by an average of 145 minutes per week in order to focus on reading and math.