Niccolò Machiavelli: History, Power, and Virtue. The politician clearly believed that the end justifies the means, since he used all kinds of nefarious means to get elected. This question must be answered one step at a time, each step of the way, to the final end. In this paper… 1293 Words 6 Pages By many, Niccolò Machiavelli is infamous for being one of the most controversial political philosophers during the period of 1494-1564. By contrast, a new prince has the more difficult task in ruling: He must first stabilise his newfound power in order to build an enduring political structure. Your argument of different cultures value or look at things differently also strikes me as a good expression.
Oliverotto, in fact, foolishly fell for this ploy after using it himself, having been betrayed by a better betrayer, namely Borgia. By acting in accordance with social and ethical norms, the ruler is deemed worthy of respect and authority. A serendipitous conjunction of Mars and Jupiter? Machiavelli's judgment that democracies need religion for practical political reasons was widespread among modern proponents of republics until approximately the time of the. Introduction, Notes and other critical apparatus by J. It means that just because a goal was reached does not validate the process by which the goal was achieved.
No one before had ever suggested cruelty could be used in a creative way for the greater good. In fact, he was apparently influencing both Catholic and Protestant kings. As a example Robin Hood stole from the rich to give to the poor. Technically speaking, this is when someone wants to achieve a goal so badly that they have no regards whether the act or the steps they need in order to achieve their goal is wrong; moreover, they even deem these bad acts as acceptable. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
Certain moral principles must never be abolished or ignored, as humans cannot exist in peace without following and respecting them. It cannot be bundled into … allowing some evil along the way finally in the end leading to a final greater good. Such methods may gain empire, but not glory… his barbarous cruelty and inhumanity… do not permit him to be celebrated among the most excellent men. For example, say that your goal is to get an A on a test. Machiavelli presents it as a series of lessons on how a republic should be started and structured.
Machivelli was not the odd philosopher out, he was the father of the modern line of thinking that led to the other later philosophers. To build this tunnel, a company hired thousands of Koreans, who were treated harshly. In doing so, whatever actions the state exercises are justified with this end goal in mind. Niccolò Machiavelli challenges our moral intuitions about moral authority in his work, the Prince, by ruthlessly defending the actions made by the state in an effort to preserve power. These are all good theories from the. There are good and bad ways to be cruel, he tells us. He routed them in battle twice, and successfully defended the city against their siege.
I disagree with the main idea of your comment Slendy. In my opinion, a real Professor is should be like a magistrate. As such, he was tortured, jailed and exiled. Together with his defence attorney , he presents examples from history to the devil to support his political theories and appeal his sentence in Hell. Although he privately circulated The Prince among friends, the only theoretical work to be printed in his lifetime was , which was about military science. Machiavelli: Cynic, Patriot, or Political Scientist? Democrazia, tirannide, profezia, a cura di G. However, besides what I said before, I may say generically that when you make a paint or a drawing with a thorough and creative hard work, I am sure that your purpose is not to beat others with the frame, even when it can be proved that they behave incredibly badly without any apparent reason excepting perhaps any weak parameter, such as ambition and greed, envy, or ignorance? But humanists did not go so far as to promote the extra glory of deliberately aiming to establish a new state, in defiance of traditions and laws.
In contrast with and , Machiavelli insisted that an imaginary ideal society is not a model by which a prince should orient himself. That way you can see trouble coming before it becomes unmanageable. Pole reported that The Prince was spoken of highly by in England and had influenced in his turn towards Protestantism, and in his tactics, for example during the. He strongly portrayed his position on this topic. This group included Vitellozzo Vitelli, the brother of Oliverotto's mentor, Paolo Vitelli. He was only removed from power when Cesare Borgia had him murdered at Senigallia. You try to stop your car but you cannot.
How can you justify the outcome of … this type of variable chosen. The portrayal of Machiavelli draws from his later writings and observations of the chaotic events of his youth before rising from obscurity to be appointed as Second Chancellor of the Florentine Republic at the age of twenty-nine, only one month after Savonarola's execution. However, most of us today view his idea of a perfect world and his actions as unacceptable. So the answer to the question would be depending on the means to get there and the end results. People of good mora … l upbringing usually do not accept such a thought process, believing that amoral means renders the goal amoral as well.
Yes, he is innocent, but as I repeatedly claim, the 'end,' saving five people, justifies the 'means,' sacrificing the one who apparently gets involved in the situation. Lots of Koreans have died by collapsing because of ruthless conditions given by the company. No one likes it when the villain is winning. It just means that they got rich through illegal acts. The content of this website is provided for informational purposes only.