Was Napoleon a hero or a tyrant? Essay Example for Free
In addition to Barras on the right, the minister of war, General Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte, a strong supporter of Jacobin causes, was considering leading a coup of his own. The people revolted against the King of France and took control of the country. The political climate in France was changing. His strategic plans were legendary up until his biggest mistake, which was invading Russia during its winter during the battles in the Waterloo Campaign. He was a man with ambition, great self-control and calculation, a great strategist, a genius; whatever it was, he was simply the best. Politicians in France rarely refer to Napoleon for fear of being accused of authoritarian temptations, or not being good Republicans.
It takes weakness to chase them out of the country, but it takes strength to assimilate them. There are many interpretations of Oliver Cromwell as he lived in the 17th century, he was seen differently at that time than he is seen today. But if the historical hero is a man of action, then a psychology of the historical hero is useless and vain. The powerful admiration of Hegel for Napoleon, admiration stressed by all the commentators of the german philosopher, admiration shared equally by one of the most famous interpreters of Hegel, A. He was a hero to the government because during his time as general, his campaign kept government financially stable somewhat, those guys really suck at economy. It should thus be used as the modern destiny for tragedy, as the power of circumstances to which the individual has to bend to.
The main idea of what most desired from the revolution was equality under law, some sort of centralized government, the elimination of the feudal system, as well as religious tolerance and career that were open to talent not birth. These reforms included religious toleration, army and educational reforms and equality before law. Napoleon lead 6000 men, against 30000 I believe, and defended the government and drove away the royalist, essentially saved everyone on the council. As his lack of success in the military continued, Bonaparte made a very poor decision. When royalist rebels marched on the National Convention, a government official told Napoleon to defend the delegates.
He was not only a hero to French, he was a hero to Italians, he was hero to Egyptians, and he was somewhat a hero to Poland. He created a new form of government and influenced revolutionaries and nationalists all around the world with his great ideas and decisions. In the old days, the army had been run by the nobility, but now there was scarcely a noble to be found in or out of the army. He also didn't enslave people like notorious villains such as Hitler and Stalin did. In 2010 an opinion poll in France asked who was the most important man in French history. It made all people equal before the law regardless of whether someone was of royal status or a peasant.
Was Napoleon Bonaparte a hero or a villain? by Tosh Martin on Prezi
Well after the revolution a lot of noblemen fled outside France or were executed, so actually Napoleon was the right person at the right moment. People like Napoleon who were willing to fight had a lot of opportunities, where he started as an officer in mainland France, he became general in 1796 and he led the campaign to Italy. What are its dominant features, which apply here? Parts of Code Napoleon still survive in legal codes of 40 countries on five continents, including America and Japan. It is obvious that his only goal while being in control of the French army was to conquer, conquer, and conquer again. The fact that Napoleon won so many battles gave the French people something to be proud of. Napoleon invaded Egypt for much of no good reason other than to gain fame. He reformed the French government, became the major-general, became First Consul of France through a unanimous referendum, used the excuse of strengthening France during hard times to make the title of First Consul hereditary and therefore becoming Napoleon I, e … mperor of France and conquered half of Europe bringing fame, fortune and glory to France.
Was Napoleon a hero or a tyrant? Essay Example for Free
Well, actually, there were at least two major plots. During much of the middle and late period of the French Revolution the young General Napoleon Bonaparte had been winning battles and gaining great popularity and respect among the French citizens. He brought about the end of religious unrest, revolutionary plots and unfair taxation. See the excellent edition by B. Under a clear blue sky, the Emperor Napoleon, wearing his trademark black felt bicorne hat, green tunic, white breeches and riding boots, emerges at the top of a stone staircase and, with a steady gaze and a salute, acknowledges the thousands assembled in the cobbled courtyard below.
Should Napoleon Bonaparte Be Considered A Hero? :: European Europe History
Spielvogel, 2007 Life of Napoleon Bonaparte Arguably one of the most… 614 Words 3 Pages Napoleon: A Leader or Dictator. Many people believe that Napoleon and Hitler are akin: notorious warlords who wanted to conquer Europe and put their respective countries on top. Napoleon was famously worshiped by his troops, but did he return their loyalty? The originality of the Hegelian philosophy of State is triple : first, the model of the modern State is not, to Hegel, English but French. Did he stabilize it or shut it down? In conclusion, Napoleon Bonaparte, was more of a hero than tyrant. France had dissolved into anarchy, with internal and international turmoil.
Should Napoleon Bonaparte Be Considered A Hero? :: European Europe History
Napoleon Bonaparte is a hero because he gave people rights and freedoms, forming an amazing educational system and reconstruction of France, along with his excellent skills with militarism, Napoleon became one of the greatest if not the greatest French leaders and heroes of all time. As a leader, the future emperor of France never took full credit for his successes and never took full blame for his discredits and defeats. Often in the harshest conditions he took this role to protect his fellow comrades. After a fierce battle with the Russian army, Napoleon entered Moscow. Napoleon had no qualms about killing French citizens. One could interpret this as being not only tyrannical but evil; he knew the risks of such a campaign, yet he sacrificed the lives of so many French men. New York: Enchanted Lion Books, 2004.
He is, to me, one of the greatest military commanders in history. His soldiers were very loyal to him. To begin with, Napoleon Bonaparte became the first consul of France. Napoleon was not only an excellent leader, but also a dominate war strategist. First, that universal history is ruled by the Absolute; then, that the Absolute is realized dialectically and progressively in the dramas, comedies and tragedies of history; finally, that heroes, nations and states constitute the successive instruments of the accomplishment of the Absolute.
